Leadership and Personnel

g Bishops
Roger Haskins
Joseph James
David Kendall
Richard Snyder

g Ministry Positions Available

g State of the Work
2006


g Calendars/Events
of the FMC


g Pastoral Training
Leadership Development
Ministerial Credentialing and Ordination

g Administration
Board of Administration

Study Commissions:
--On Doctrine
--On Bioethics


Dept of Administration and Finance

g Human Resources

g WMC Employee Directory

Richard Snyder   - Eastern Area      Contact Me

Ranchers Needed
R. D. Snyder

When Dr. Lyle Schaller introduced the idea that some pastors serve as shepherds and some as ranchers, many began an attempt to develop a rancher type model of congregational leadership. Taking as its basis the Exodus 18 story of Moses assigning leaders to groups of 10, 100 and 1000, pastors began to dream of equipping leaders who would care for the people, "so that the body of Christ would be built up" (Eph. 4:12).

The idea behind this concept is simple: Shepherds care for individual sheep while ranchers care for those who are caring for the sheep. Joel Comisky in his book Leadership Explosion notes the characteristics of a pastor-shepherd versus a pastor-rancher:

CHARACTERISTICS OF A PASTOR VERSUS A RANCHER
TRADITIONAL PASTOR-SHEPHERD

RANCHER
- Tries to personally satisfy all of the needs.
- Believes that he is responsible for everything.
- Participates in every meeting.
- Depends on the compliments of others. - Does not delegate much.
- Vision is limited by what he can do.
- Sees the congregation as individuals and not as groups of people.
- Does not possess clear church growth goals for the church.

- Focuses on small groups to care for the church.
- Is the leader of the church and is not afraid of making changes.
- Delegates with flexibility. Is more concerned with the results than the process.
- Is able to say NO to ministry opportunities, if there is someone else that can do it.
- Creates roles for the congregation to fill.
- Wants the people to be free from dependence on him.
- Is an excellent administrator. Reserves time for planning and prayer.
- Raises up and trains the leaders of small groups.

Some pastors who were serving small churches of 30-60 people thought they should become ranchers. So, they quit a whole lot of the traditional work of the pastor such as visiting all the members regularly, doing all or nearly all the hospital visitation, attending all the committee meetings, etc. Many of the people chaffed under this, thinking the pastor was lazy or shunning her/his responsibility.

In fact, several years ago one superintendent said to me out of frustration, "I wish pastors who don't have a ranch would quit trying to be ranchers. After all, they have a farm with a little flock and they should just be shepherds." This sounded somewhat reasonable to me, but the more I thought about it the more incorrect the idea became. So, I've asked myself, how would I function as a pastor if assigned to a church of 30 people? "Just about the same way were I to be appointed to a church of 3,000." The big difference would be that the church of 3,000 would already have a different set of expectations of the pastor than the church of 30. Therefore, more energy would need to go into illustrating to the smaller church that "we are a ranch."

Wait a minute! How can a church of 30 be a ranch? Remember, the church is not a building. The church is open range. A church of 30 people may be surrounded by an unchurched population of 30,000. It will take a rancher mindset and a rancher strategy to care for the people in the ministry range of the church building.

So, here is how, under God I'd aim to work as a pastor-rancher, no matter the size of the congregation.

1. Is it reasonable to say that no matter the size of a church, pastors must contribute significant time to the nurture of their own soul, heart and mind? The morning would be devoted to prayer, study of the Scriptures, and reading, sprinkled with a good dose of planning so that work with people could have maximum effectiveness.

2. Nearly all the rest of my time would be spent in leadership development. This means that through prayer and careful observation I would try to determine which people in the church have potential for leadership and who were already exercising healthy leadership. At first, I'd take these people with me as contact occurs with other people in various settings. I'd give them assignments when ready and have them report back on their ministry. Key equipping in the ways and means of developing cells and new leaders would be the primary focus. Multiplication of leaders, disciples and groups would be a constant theme and at the appropriate time the planting of other churches would be placed on a front burner.

3. Without hesitation and with Biblical and historical authority, I would preach, teach and practice this vision. If and when people complained that the pastor was spending too much time with the leadership, I'd in love explain the vision and point out (because the assignments given and carried out would have accomplished it) that they and others were receiving more care and attention than they could ever receive from the pastor. I'd assure them of my love, but also let them know that God had called me to "equip the saints for works of service so that the whole body would be built up." I'd also ask if they would like to be part of the leadership corps that was being prepared and sent into the harvest. And I'd call upon them to pray for those who are leading and attempting to take the city for Christ.

4. Then I'd go home, enjoy my wife and family, listening to all the joys and challenges of their lives. (Of course, I'd take them on ministry assignments as well so that our heartbeats would be in unison.)